Вартовий
Подія

Tactic.

Cost: 1.
Test Icons:

Search the top 9 cards of your deck for a Weapon asset and add it to your hand. Shuffle your deck.

Robert Laskey
Кров на вівтарі #184.
Prepared for the Worst
Reviews

I'm am firmly in the camp that this card is a must-add to literally every deck, (ok, not Carolyn.) Tutors like this are just so efficient and smooth out clunkiness. It isn't a splashy or fun card, but you'd rather run this than a less apt weapon for your deck. Run 3 to 4 weapons and a playset of this card. Yes, you can run it with 3 weapons just fine, you'll hit a weapon a vast majority of the time and you're not building your deck fretting over 5% ~ 10% chances. It makes upgrading into better expensive weapons like Flamethrower better at every stage of the game. It helps you fetch any character-specific weapons. If you're playing at higher difficulties, it really is necessary.

LordHamshire · 590
Every Guardian deck? Even Carolyn? — StyxTBeuford · 12879
I’m not a big fan of this in a starting deck if I can just run 6 level 0 weapons. Certainly as you pour xp into weapons and ou want to increase your odds of getting your better weapons, it’s good, but the power difference of lvl 0 weapons isn’t enough to justify the extra resource and action to play this. Especially on Leo, Skids, and Jenny who can easily pick up a copy later in the campaign through Adaptable. Okay, the other two aren’t Guardians, but can certainly be played as them. — Death by Chocolate · 1326
The fundamental question is whether the 3rd level 0 weapon is equal to or better than a machete or a .45. If yes, then this card is just a 1 resource tax. If not, then this card wins out (save for the fact that it is possible to completely wiff). I'm way behind on new tech, so I don't know if there's a third valid weapon option for most guardians. — Ergonomic Cat · 45
I strongly disagree that 3 weapons + 2 PftW is a good idea. That leaves you with a very high chance of PftW completely missing. The odds are NOT "5% or 10%." That is just untrue. They are actually about 30%. That's really high! — CaiusDrewart · 2977
Now, I do think this card has a good niche in the mid-to-late campaign, when you have 1-2 high-XP superweapons plus 3-4 backup weapons in your deck. PftW will then increase your odds of hitting your superweapon (not guaranteeing it, but still, it helps), while being very likely to hit something. It's nice on Stick to the Plan, too. — CaiusDrewart · 2977
But yeah, I agree with Death by Chocolate that this is actually a rather poor card in a level 0 deck. If you're playing without the Taboo list, the Machete is enough better than the other level 0 weapons which provides some reason to play this. But if you're playing with the list, running 6 level 0 weapons is a lot better even than 4 weapons + 2 PftW. Just drawing a weapon is better and more efficient than PftW -> playing a weapon, and just running 6 weapons also reduces the risk that you end up weaponless (because you don't have to deal with the possibility, however slim, of PftW missing.) That said, I could see including 1 in a level 0 deck, because it will become good later in the campaign. — CaiusDrewart · 2977
Well let's assume you hard mulligan for a weapon: You have about a 70% chance of getting one of your three weapons in that opening hand. So given that you land on that 30% and you have Prepared for the Worst on Stick to the Plan (the best place for it), then using it you have an 80% chance of drawing into your weapon (since SttP cuts your deck size by 3, so it bumps the odds here). So altogether with 3 weapons, Stick to the Plan, and a single copy of Prepared for the Worst, the chances of drawing your weapon within the first turn is .7 + .3(.8), or about 94%. So a single copy with SttP is good, but I wouldn't run SttP just for Prepared for the Worst. There has to be other tactics or supplies that you want, like Custom/Extra ammunition. And without SttP you shouldn't fall into the trap of hard mulligan-ing for Prepared for the Worst OR your weapons, because a 30% chance of whiffing while losing a resource, an action, and a card is too high risk. — StyxTBeuford · 12879
Yes, that's right. And the synergy is nice here, because Stick to the Plan + Prepared for the Worst + Extra Ammo + a high-XP weapon (preferably Flamethrower) all combine for a really nice, synergistic build. I just think this card is mediocre in a level 0 deck. Granted, if I'm planning on that aforementioned build, I will take a copy right away rather than spend 1 XP for one later. — CaiusDrewart · 2977
And in fairness it has two very relevant icons, so it’s not the worst lvl 0 card. — StyxTBeuford · 12879
Sure. I'd call it mediocre rather than bad in the early going, but then a very nice one-of in the later campaign once you have enough XP support. I do think that cutting two weapons from your starting deck and replacing them with two of these is a big trap, though. — CaiusDrewart · 2977
It’s also more than just a one resource tax - it also taxes an action which is a pretty big deal. As far as other viable level 0 weapons, Enchanted Blade is solid, and Survival Knife is a reasonable 3rd weapon. Leo can get away with rogue weapons, since he probably runs beat cops. Roland and Tommy have a signature gun. The .45 Thompson is usable too. Mark can get away with the .32 Colt. Tommy can also run Meat Cleaver. — Death by Chocolate · 1326

I wanted to like this card. For a long time I used to run 2 copies of it in Guardian builds. Then, after a while, I started running only one copy of it (which is not something I normally do with cards) - and now I generally omit it altogether.

The reasons why I used to include this 2 copies of card at first:

  • In other card games, "tutor" effects (cards that search your deck for other cards) are normally powerful because they let you search your deck for things that you really need, adding consistency.
  • After you draw a 5-card opening hand of a 33-card deck (standard for most investigators after adding signature cards and weaknesses), you are left with 28 cards. Prepared for the Worst lets you search the top 9 cards of your deck, so that's just under a third of the deck, which is not bad.
  • Weapons are important. If you're without a weapon and your role in your group is to kill things, you can get overwhelmed really, really fast.

Why I ultimately stopped including this card altogether:

  • The cost for using this ability is one card, one resource, and one action. That's really expensive for what it does, especially considering you then have to spend another action and more resources to play the card that you found using its effect.
  • It's not even guaranteed to succeed! When it misses, it really hurts. It's also least effective at the beginning of the game (as you have the most cards in your deck) and that's arguably when you need it most, since the beginning of the game is when you're setting things up.
  • Efficiency-wise, it's often better to just have slightly cheaper weapon that you can use until one of your primary weapons come up.
  • In my experience, if you have 4 good weapons in a 33 card deck, you have a reasonable chance of getting one in your opening hand if you mulligan specifically to look for one.

Why I used one copy of this card for a little bit:

  • It has good synergy with Stick to the Plan since it has the Tactic keyword and it's a card that can help you early on in a scenario. It increases a deck's ability to start reliably well.
  • Two copies just seemed excessive since the second one will normally be not very useful.

This card preys on weapon anxiety - the fear that you'll end up with no weapons when you really need them. I don't think this card is the answer to weapon anxiety, though - it's too expensive, too slow, and too unreliable to guarantee that you'll get the weapon you need. The only use I can think of for this card would be if you really want to use it to try and fish out a big gun - think Lightning Gun or Flamethrower - at a midway point through a campaign when you've already bought one copy of the big gun and don't have enough experience yet for a second copy. Even then, though, my advice would still be to simply use other weapons to keep yourself going until your big gun shows up.

Unless some other cards come out to make this more viable or desirable, I would say this card is probably worth passing on for the time being.

Until you have 2 or more superweapons (4-5xp each), this card is just worse than having another level 0 Weapon. To the point that I’m willing to spend 1 xp to buy a copy of this after I have them and Stick to the Plan. Ideally you are Leo Anderson and can just Adaptable them in. I ran the numbers and having one copy of this under SttP with two big weapons roughly improves your mulligan odds from 60% to 80% of getting the big weapon out on turn 1. With two level 0 back up weapons I almost never end the first turn without a weapon in hand or play. — Death by Chocolate · 1326
Be aware that Stick to the Plan exhausts when used. So if you find a weapon with this card, you have to wait another turn to play Ever Vigilant and get it out. — Django · 4753

I think this is a serious contender for the most overrated and overplayed card in all of Arkham. A lot of people insist that this card is a staple Guardian card that should be played in pretty much every deck that has weapons as it makes your deck more consistent. In reality, I think this card is pretty subpar and should only be ran in very specific decks because it makes your deck less consistent.

"But this card lets you tutor for weapons. How can it make your deck less consistent?" Firstly, tutors in other card games are valuable because you can look at your whole deck, which effectively turns it into a toolbox where you can pick the best card for your current situation. This card only looks at the top 9 cards. In most cases with this card, you do not have a choice which weapon you pick, either because you only get offered one weapon, two copies of the same weapon, or no weapon at all. And unlike card filter effects, this card does not have much flexibility in what it can give you. Cards like Eureka! can be used to get any card in the top 3. Prepared for the Worst though, if you don't need a weapon then there's not much point in using it. Weapons in general are a type of card that largely help with only one thing (killing enemies) and often have pretty big overlap in how useful they are so if you have one weapon the second and third incur diminishing returns. As a result, in most decks this card becomes a lot less useful if you draw it later, which means that you'll usually have to commit it instead. To its credit, the card does have alright icons for a level 0 card, but it's not great icons for a card that you'll be committing a pretty good chunk of the time.

That's not even mentioning perhaps the biggest issue with the consistency of this card: it can whiff. This creates sort of a paradox for this card in that no matter how many weapons you run, this card has consistency problems. If you run a lot of weapons, you have a higher chance of drawing those weapons without the help of this card, thus making this card redundant. If you are running fewer weapons, you increase the chance of whiffing and not getting any weapon at all.

And the thing is that even when the card works properly, it's not even that good especially at level 0. Sure, Machete is probably a better card than .45 Automatic. But is it better if it costed 4 resources and an extra action to play? Probably, but it's a lot closer. The big issue with level 0 decks is that the best level 0 weapons aren't SO much better than the alternatives that I feel like I need to run a card like Prepared for the Worst to more consistently find them. Instead of playing a Prepared for the Worst to find a weapon, you can just play another weapon and skip the possibility of whiffing with it as well as the action and resource you have to burn even if it does hit. MAYBE if you're running a deck with just Runic Axe, it might be worth it to run this card since you don't realistically need and can't even use other weapons. But firstly, I think that is less PFTW being a great card and more that Runic Axe is pretty overpowered, and secondly that's only one type of deck, most everyone else I think you're better off just running more weapons.

"But what about Stick to the Plan?" While putting it on Stick to the Plan does help with the "just run another weapon" problem a bit, it also has another issue where if you find your weapons and don't need to use it you not only are wasting one of your precious 3 slots on Stick to the Plan that you could have put something else on, but you can't even commit it to a test as a fallback plan. And the odds of that happening are actually pretty good.

I think what really sunk the card for me was when I actually looked up the odds of finding cards, both naturally and off PFTW. If you have 4 weapons in your deck, you have about an 85% chance to find a weapon within your first 3 draws if you mulligan 3 cards in your opener. If you fully prioritize weapons with the mulligan, that goes up to about 90%. And once you factor in stuff like Beat Cop, Vicious Blow, and any other sources of damage you might have, you can realistically still stall for a couple turns to find a weapon even if you do hit the very low odds of not finding a weapon at roughly the start of the game. PFTW on Stick to the Plan is really only good in the situations where you whiff on a weapon in your mulligan, while also getting a hit when you play the card your first turn. If you mulligan 3 cards, you have a 25% chance of not finding a weapon. And if you use PFTW immediately after the mulligan, you have a 84% chance of hitting. In total, if you mulligan 3 cards and keep 2, you'll have the best-case PFTW scenario of whiffing on weapons in your opener but finding it off PFTW about 21% of the time. The other 79% you'll either find a weapon normally, or you'll whiff on PFTW, and if you try to aggressively mulligan for weapons that percentage of positive outcomes for PFTW shrinks even more. IMO, if you're running 4 weapons or more, you really don't need PFTW on Stick to the Plan to consistently find weapons, you're better off putting something else on there and maybe throwing another weapon in if you're really that concerned.

What about 3 weapons? On a 3 mulligan, you have a 36% chance of whiffing a weapon and 74% chance of finding one off PFTW. So in total that's about a 27% chance of getting the best case scenario for this card. Better than 4 weapons, but still not great. Meanwhile the odds of finding a weapon normally in the early game are 76% on a 3 mulligan, or 83% on a full mulligan. For 2 weapons, your odds are 50% to whiff a weapon off a 3 mulligan, but only 58% to hit one off PFTW. That's about a 21% chance to get the weapon off PFTW, but you also have a 21% chance of both whiffing on your mulligan and whiffing on your PFTW, which would be catastrophic.

Lastly, a lot of people argue that this weapon is better when you have XP weapons in your deck. I don't really agree. The issue is that in most scenarios, the time that you REALLY need your big guns is near the end of the scenario when a boss monster spawns in, and by that time you'll have a good chance of finding it even if you don't play PFTW or much card draw in general. If your XP weapon is something that has ammo on it, I'd argue that finding it early is actually not a good thing because that means you'll be burning ammo on less threatening enemies so you'll have lest leftover for when the boss shows up. From my experience, it's not THAT important to find your XP weapons early. You'll usually find them eventually by scenario's end, and that's what really matters.

IMO, unless all the other weapons in the game are so poor for your build that they're not worth bothering with, you are generally going to be better off adding more weapons to your deck and mulliganing aggressively for them than you will be adding PFTW to your deck, even if you have it on Stick to the Plan. In most decks, the advantages of having slightly higher quality weapons and being able to mulligan less aggressively is outweighed by the fact that you have to spend an action and a resource to get your weapons off this and that a big chunk of the time you'll find a weapon normally anyway which makes this card a lot less useful.

Overall, I feel like the best situations for this card are either A: when you really only want to run 2 weapons that hyper synergize with your deck, and running more wouldn't really help your deck at all, or B: you have several weapons that you want all out at the same time as they provide different utility, like maybe if you're running Survival Knife or Garrote Wire in addition to your other weapons and don't have good access to card draw otherwise. The issue though is that even in those situations though, I feel like you're better off spending some XP and getting the upgraded Prepared for the Worst instead as it provides a lot of solid upgrades for just 2 XP, and since you probably are going to slap it on Stick to the Plan it's a fairly decent use of 2 XP since you'll use that card every game. And in those situations, I would probably still not bother with the level 0 version since it's much worse when it's not on Stick to the Plan and I'd rather just get the card when I need it instead of running the clunky level 0 version in my deck for the first couple scenarios when it won't be very effective. For every other Guardian deck, I would run more weapons instead if I felt like I wasn't finding them consistently enough as this card is generally either inconsistent or unnecessary depending on how many weapons you're running.

EDIT: One final thing I forgot to mention was that if you are playing with a significantly limited card pool, (such as if you only have a handful of expansions that don't have great weapons and/or you're playing with teammates that also want the same weapons you do and you're forced to share) then the value of this card does go up a bit. If the next best weapon for your deck is something like a .32 Colt and you're a 4 Combat investigator, it might be worth running PFTW instead. But assuming you have access to most of the current card pool, I don't think that running slightly less optimal weapons is a big deal especially with Machete going back to 0 XP.

Another EDIT: I recalculated my statistics assuming that 3 of the cards were missing from the starting deck due to being attached to Stick to the Plan. This makes the statistics even less favorable towards PFTW.

Sylvee · 98
Sometimes when you build, your trying to maximize the good outcome. But there are also times where you try to minimize the bad (hence the term min-max: minimize the bad, maximize the good). Sometimes results are bad enough that paying high costs to avoid them, even if they are not likely, is worth it: It doesn't matter how cheaply you can build a dam for with 'only' an 2% chance it breaks and kills a bunch of people in a flood. Even though there is a 98% chance any money spent eliminating that 2% chance is wasted, its still worth it once we run it through a payoff matrix because 2% of disaster is still a disaster and not worth the 98% of whatever savings you made. Likewise, being left without your weapons for an extended period of time as guardian is could be unacceptable for your team, especially in a 4 player game, and is worth 'wasting' a stick to the plan slot, because its one of the most efficient ways to set your 'draw 0 weapons' reality to nearly 0% assuming your deck has 5 weapons (assuming you have a sig, 2 primary, and 2 backup weapons). The value of that slot is high, but I wouldn't say it wins you 10% of a scenario, which is what the payoff looks like. You go from having a 1 in 10 chance of not drawing a weapon turn 1 to a 1% chance, which depending on how bad not having a weapon is in your payoff matrix is a good bet. That said, there are very valid alternatives to prepared for the worst these days to get that level of consistency, such as running backpack, underworld market, black market, ect., all of which are good alternatives to this card in terms of increasing consistency to 'yes' levels while also having much higher side benefits than Prep for the worst. Also more and more cards exist that let both guardians and non-guardians be comfortable with the guardian not holding a weapon. — dezzmont · 198
So firstly, I realized I miscalculated the percentages initially. I assumed that the initial decksize for mulligans is 31 (30 plus signature, weaknesses are redrawn so don't count) and the deck post-mulligan is 29 because there's 5 cards missing but the 2 weaknesses can be drawn now. In my comparisons, those numbers should have been 28 and 26 because 3 of the cards from the deck were also removed from Stick to the Plan. This would actually make the odds of finding your weapons even higher and would even more make PFTW less necessary. — Sylvee · 98
(Didn't realize enter wouldn't add spaces, whoops) Secondly, while I get the idea of mitigating failure being sometimes more important than strengthening success, I have two issues with it in this context. Firstly, as someone who pretty much exclusively plays 4-player, I think that if anything higher player counts make stumbling on weapons less punishing as due to the amount of redundancy your team will have if you don't find a weapon immediately, there's a good chance your Rogue/Mystic/Survivor/whoever will and can cover for you while you find a weapon. Secondly, even if you do want to mitigate not finding a weapon further, why not just run a 6th weapon instead and have your Stick to the Plan slot dedicated to something else? With 6 weapons, you have over a 96% chance to find a weapon even if you keep 2 cards on the mulligan. In those 96% of games, you get an extra card off Stick to the Plan in exchange for running one more weapon in your deck. — Sylvee · 98
But with more weapons in your deck you have less options for other cards. Also is the pool of 0xp weapons which reliable deal 2 damage per hit limited without non guardian-weapons. Depending on your team another member like to have one of them too. And even if the math is not the best I think this card is a good choice for sttp. — Tharzax · 1
Strong agree, have always found this card ridiculously overrated. The sad thing is, the levelled version in TSK doesn't really fix any of the problems with it, just turning it into a support card for no real reason. Making it cost only a single action and no extra resources is nice enough, though not really worth 2 exp. — SSW · 202
Luckily, the card comes with useful icons so even if you don't need it for the text, it is not a complete waste. If you notice you don't have the no-weapon problem in the first scenarios, at least you have an easy target for replacement. Better than the opposite. — Trady · 164
@Tharzax At level 0 you have access to Runic Axe, Machete, Enchanted Blade, and if you're really desperate .45 Automatic. Unless you either have a limited collection or have teammates poaching the weapons from you, there is no issue running out of usable level 0 weapons when just sticking to the Guardian cardpool. Also PFTW doesn't really free up slots for your deck, the card effectively is just another weapon, so 5 weapons is functionally the same as 4 weapons + PFTW, except if you have Stick to the Plan PFTW takes up one of its slots which IMO is much more valuable than a random card in your deck. — Sylvee · 98
And then along came backpack! — Zerogrim · 282
While I agree with some of the things you mentioned, I am a firm user of PftW, and I use it vastly because I almost always have one set of weapons that I upgrade early on and these are my "go to" weapons. I will always choose a certain weapon over another because I have a certain strategy in mind that goes around it: Butterfly Swords (2) for the 3 damage attack, Shotgun for overcommit, Holy Spear for Bless, etc... No other weapon will function nearly as well in that spot. Therefore the question is: is it better to play 1 resource and 1 action for PftW and find then my weapon, or to play 3 resources and 1 action for a weaker weapon that I will replace anyways as soon as I find my primary weapon. I could then upgrade 2 sets of weapons, but then I'd much rather pay XP for backpack (2). To conclude, to me the only downside of PftW, after you gained you first 10xp, is its lack of consistency: if you hard mulligan for weapons and you miss, then play it and whiff, then it *really* sucks... But that meant that you were not about to draw it anytime soon and at least you shuffled your deck so you have another chance. — Valentin1331 · 47783
Spiciest review in a while, but yeah, PfTW seems to mostly be a relic of the time where good weapons were so few and far between you /had/ to do '4 good weapons, 2 PfTW' instead of just '6 good weapons'. Still has use in decks where you want that SPECIFIC weapon - runic axes, chainsaws, holy spears ... — Teag · 42

Edit: Updated for the times.

TL:DR. Slotting Prepared for the Worst is worse then slotting another weapon if your goal is to have "any good weapon". Slot Prepared for the Worst only when you want to consistently field a particular weapon (Lightning Gun for example).

Prepared for the Worst, pretty good card, but only required in some pretty specific builds.

So, "tutor a weapon", really great for those times where you want a weapon in your hand, yeah? In deckbuilding Prepared for the Worst is largely interchangeable with weapons, card for card.

Here's the thing, if you want a gun in your hand. And fill your deck with guns, why bother with this thing? On one hand you play with so and so many guns and have this thing in your deck, spend an action and a resource (and card!) to fish for the gun, and THEN play the gun. Why not just, skip this damn thing, put 2 more guns in your deck, draw the gun straight from the start rather then bothering with this middle man?

So. For the explicit purpose of having a weapon, Prepared for the Worst is a hoop you just dont need to jump through anymore. There's a literal plethora of viable weapons now! .45 Automatic and .45 Thompson and Machete and Enchanted Blade and all the out of class stuff too! You can easily have a deck that's 50% weapons!

That said, Prepared for the Worst is still a great card, it just has a more defined purpose these days. The real point of Prepared for the Worst is not to ensure you have a weapon in your hand. The purpose of Prepared for the Worst is to have THAT weapon in your hand, you know. KNIFE!!! I kid, I'm of course talking about that investigator strength gun like Jenny's Twin .45s or Detective's Colt 1911s or a really big XP device like Lightning Gun or Flamethrower.

Bonus: It doesn't hurt that when Prepared for the Worst isn't needed for it's explicit purpose, you can chuck it at an investigate or fight action.

Tsuruki23 · 2446
I agree! And it's gets even better when you start upgrading to Xp-cost weapons. Need that single lightning gun in your deck This card will help you find it! <3 — olahren · 2893
When you wanted to ensure you drew into a weapon early in game back in the core set days, one would stuff his/her deck with 6 weapons. Half of them made you cry when you actually drew them, since you dont want to draw that crappy knife, you want the Machete. With Prepared for the worst you get the stuff you want, be that with an extra action use and an extra resource cost. — Heyenzzz · 6113
Must-include with lightning gun or flamethrower build -- no way around it (unless you want to gimp your deck). — crymoricus · 232

I figured most people know the optimal policy for this card by now, but getting it into a review of the card itself will help out newer people.

TL;DR:If you are using this to run only two weapons and benefit consistently from high XP weapons, you should mulligain discarding anything that is not a weapon if you didn't open with one, and then on your first turn spend all your actions drawing, and then your second turn spending two drawing and then playing this card.

Most modern guardians run 2 weapons (maybe 3 if a signature is a weapon) and two of this early, and then sometimes going down to one of this on Stick to the plan because, if you use it correctly, you will have a 90% chance of getting one of your two weapons in the first two turns using this card.

If you 'hard mulligan' (discarding literally any card that isn't your weapon if you didn't open with a weapon) you have a 55% chance to find one of the two copies of your weapon in your deck. If you don't find it in that pool, and then go for it with prepared for the worst, you have a 55% chance to find one of the copies in the top 9 cards. This means that you have an 80% chance to find the weapon, but that means 1-2 games a scenario you will fail to have your weapons in the first two turns of the game, which can get... rough, especially because if this card misses you didn't thin your deck and now will have a hellish time finding your guns.

But if you instead take your first turn entirely drawing cards, and then on your second turn draw 2 cards and play this, your odds increase, and Prepared for the worst plus the draws will find your weapon 79% of the time. Combined with the hard mulligain and you will be starting with your weapon, which means you find those guns 91% of the time. If you really slow-roll and play this turn 3 (perhaps playing an ally on your 6th action, but still getting your upkeep draw) you will nab it 95% of the time, meaning you will proably never fail to get your gun by turn 3 in any campaign, though this may lean on your flex-evader in a 4 man group.

Compare to just trying to draw into your weapon manually using the same policy. On your mulligan you got the same odds, but if you spend an entire two turns drawing you will only find a copy of your guns around 40% of the time, meaning in total you have about a 20% chance to brick out on the first two turns. So you are probably going to fail to find your weapon once, maybe twice in your campaign before turn 3.

What is worse is that the realities where you brick your mulligan can be far worse. You will fail your mulligain about 50% of the time. If you do, you still find it by the end of turn 2 50% of the time, but you have a 20% chance to take 5 turns to find your gun, meaning that a little under once a campaign you will be unarmed for half a scenario, if you can even afford to spend 4 turns doing nothing but drawing! Once you need to start doing a bad Nathaniel Cho impression your rate of finding your weapon becomes much worse and it becomes realistic you will never see a copy in a game if you need to give up by the end of turn 2.

And if you fire this off turn 1, you have a 60% chance of bricking there, and if that happens you enter the 'draw and pray' statistical reality and suddenly you start risking trauma once or twice in your campaign because your gun never shows up. So really, take it slow and don't Hail Mary Prepared For the Worst turn 1 hoping your weapons are in the top third of your deck, get it to the point where they only need to be in the top half and this card will make you a much happier camper.

This card is a huge difference maker in 2 weapon decks if used right, it is probably Guardian's most meta-defining card to the point it makes it really hard for the designers to make any sort of 'mid-grade' or 'backup' weapon in Guardian and heavily warps the card pool, but if you use it wrong it is going to make you miserable compared to running 4 weapons.

dezzmont · 198
Practically speaking though, there's so little advantage to cut out backup weapons from your deck when upgrading it. There hardly a deck that's that tight on deck space. — suika · 8997
Quite a lot of popular decks do in fact cut backup weapons. I personally generally run 4 unless I am really playing around a weird weapon,the prevailing logic is that spare guns are rough draw wise it seems. Either way if someone netdecks a 2 of deck it is still good to have how to pilot them somewhere! — dezzmont · 198
Oh certainly, which is why I tell new players to not trust popular decks too much. There's a lot of badly built decks that somehow became popular. — suika · 8997
I agree that this method is the the right way to maximize the chances of drawing your weapon with the card, although at the expensive cost of wasting 6 card draw actions since you'll exceed your hand size. It's still better than becoming useless if you didn't include any backup weapons in your hand and weren't lucky enough to find your 2 weapons in your opening hand. — suika · 8997
Agreed. Sort by votes at the very least! Two weapon decks can work in SPECIFIC circumstances when you legit only want one gun and it is the basis of your entire deck, but otherwise even one more gun (say... your signature if you got one) dramatically rockets up your first turn play rate of a weapon (70% on mulligain, 83% on draw-draw-prep, for 95% odds of getting your weapon). — dezzmont · 198
Unless you’re an extremely niche deck (such as a Beckzodia Tommy), it’s always worth bringing backup weapons. You will find a use for the spare pitches, and not whiffing I’m Prepared for the Worst is worth it. Late game you can always upgrade the backup weapons to Grenades so they can even be played alongside your big gun and provide synergy. — Death by Chocolate · 1326

Commenting because I don't see this point in the other reviews - I believe this there is great synergy between this card and Stick to the Plan SPECIFICALLY when you are also running 3 of Astounding Revelation. You get your first Astounding Revelation when you set up Stick to the Plan before the game even starts. You can have 1 copy of Prepared for the Worst in your deck and attach it to Stick to The Plan. Whenever you need to search for a weapon you have a decent chance of getting your second Astounding Revelation. By playing only one copy Prepared for the Worst and Sticking it to that Plan, you also avoid the dead draw of a PFTW when you don't need more weapons.

If it's your first play of the game you have a 60% chance of finding one of the two Astounding Revelations in your deck of 25 cards.

If it's your first play of the game and you have no weapon in your opening hand, you have the following probability of finding at least one weapon in the 9 card search:

6 in deck: 95.24%

5 in deck: 91.8%

4 in deck: 85.6%

3 in deck: 75.7%

2 in deck: 60%

gamwizrd1 · 2
I can’t say I’m super impressed by the second and third Astounding Revelation in here. What oh don’t account for is the ~30% chance at least one Surprised Rabbi will start in your hand, the guarantee that you will always have one dead copy unless you run more search effects, such as Tetsuo Mori. It also puts pressure on you to use PftW even if you have a weapon in hand at the start just to clear one out of your deck - in which case you’re really only getting 1 free resource from the second AS. Finally, the single Int pitch is pretty bad in most guardians, even the ones who can run it. Starting with 7 resources is generally enough to get a guardian rolling. I think there definitely could be a place for triple AS in Guardian IF they run more consistent deck searching, (run with Mr. Rook soon before he inevitably gets tabood this summer!), but generally I think you still only want one copy, even if you bring the PftW on SttP (which I think is a solid consistency choice in its own. — Death by Chocolate · 1326