Jeremiah Kirby
Arctic Archaeologist

Здобуток. Ally

Ally. Miskatonic. Wayfarer.

Cost: 4.

Health: 2. Sanity: 1.

You get +1 .

After Jeremiah Kirby enters play, choose "even" or "odd:" Reveal the top 5 cards of your deck. Draw each card with a cost that matches the chosen option. Shuffle the remaining cards into your deck.

Romana Kendelic
Edge of the Earth Investigator Expansion #32.

Latest Taboo

This card’s ability gains: “(Max twice per game.)”

Jeremiah Kirby


(from the official FAQ or responses to the official rules question form)
  • Q: It doesn't seem obvious whether Jeremiah Kirby can find A Chance Encounter (2) or other X-costed cards when looking for even-costed cards. This rules section ( makes me think that X=0. 0 is an even number. A: We agree that while an X-costed card exists in a deck, the rule of “X=0 if undefined” would apply. And yes, “0” is an even number. So, it is possible to use Jeremiah Kirby’s ability, choose “even,” reveal A Chance Encounter (2), and draw it. (Rules form, December 2023)
Last updated


Firstly, I assume the FAQ will state that - is neither even nor odd, nor are uncosted weaknesses.

It is also important to remember 0 is an even number for lots of reasons and if it isn't in your local reality I am sorry and you contact your local Old One to offer your service to them, because the structure of the universe has already broken down to the point math is starting to fail. This can have big ramifications that push you towards 'even' due to cards like emergency cache and just because there are a LOT of 0 cost events, which is nice for synergizing with card draw.

Jeremiah is very interesting because he encourages you to play a deck that leans towards evens or odds. If you play him in a deck that is split right down the middle between your desired result of evens or odds, vs odds or evens depending on what you picked as well as all your skills and uncosted weaknesses, you are going to expect an average result of 3, rather than the 2.5 you might expect, due to the fact 0 is a possibility here and thus we are dealing with a range of 6 results rather than 5. However, how extreme the results can swing vary with how depleted your deck is. If your deck is split after mulligain and you play him turn 1, you have a 15% chance to get 4 cards or 1 card, and a 2% chance to get 0 or 5, and a 33% chance to get 3.

However, if it has been a few turns and you have drawn a couple cards and somehow managed to stay perfectly even (which is unlikely, but your deck will try to 'push' towards an even distribution because of hypogeometric probability: Your more likely to draw cards that are over-represented which means they get less over-represented) and you are down to 18 cards with 9 skills, undesired results, or weaknesses vs 9 of your desired 'hits,' you will find that you only have a 1.5% chance of the super extreme 0 and 5 results, a 35% chance to get 3 cards, and a 35% chance to get 2 and 4! This is because of that aforementioned hypogeometric probability kicking in 'harder:' if you drew 3 'hits' already, there are 3 hits already gone and now its really 6 'good' cards vs 9 'bad' ones.

So, on average this is proooobably drawing you 3, and it gets less stable as time goes on. But a 4 cost ally with poor soak potential (especially if they are your main lore buff!) who is netting you +1 investigate is merely sufficient. Our good old buglover probably still is beating out Kirby at that expected result: Seeker has a lot of good draw already, which can be used to assist allies after your set up, and while resources are generally less valuable seeker has a lot of expensive effects that can benefit from an extra cash a turn if your constantly investigating. If your going more testless seeker then draw helps more but the lore doesn't. He is a great stepping stone to other cards, but doesn't shine at those results. You could use charisma to run both, which I find questionable because seeker doesn't need THAT much help with lore tests and they do have some other great options for boosting them, but we can loop back around to that in a hot second.

But what if we slanted our deck towards even or odds? Lets say we make our deck almost entirely evens or odds cost cards, so that after our opening draw we have 20. How good is he then? We now get 4 cards around 40% of the time if we open with Kirby, 3 cards 30% of the time, 5 cards 15% of the time, 2 cards 10% of the time, 1 card 1% of the time, and 0 cards essentially never, with that result occurring less than 1 in 1000 times. This isn't a big gain in our expected upper limit (you should still probably plan for 3 most of the time), but you will 'brick' less often and draw 2 or fewer way less, making a more consistent rollout, and you probably care way more about NOT drawing 0, 1, or ideally 2, than you do about getting lucky and drawing 4 or 5, so it isn't too terrible that this mostly mitigates the disaster scenario and ensure you have some stuff to commit to tests or get you out of a pinch, rather than pushes the upper boundary of excess cards you might not need.

Is this worth it? Well Seeker has a LOT of really good even cost cards, so I would not be shocked to see an evens seeker: Glyphs and its upgrades, upgraded magnifying glass, Dream Diary,, book of old lore, encyclopedia,, occult lexicon AND the blood rites it adds to your deck, shortcut the list goes on and on. There are some power players in the odds slots, for example Necronomicon comes to mind, but its not too critical to avoid getting ANY odds, just not too many, so if you want the odd strange solution it isn't the end of the world.

Oh, and also, he apparently is good pals with a certain bug doctor which means he can self accelerate you into getting two ally slot lore boosts, which combined with some of the rest of this package may result in a neat "Clue Shotgun Daisy" build where you stack as many bonuses as you can to fire off guiding stones.

The big draw for odds I think would be that Kirby can help you snag up some segments of onyx, which is a big concern for any seeker and a huge reason to run card draw and deck search. Overall though, the odds slot seems a bit of a weaker pick for him (Which is why I think he was made an even card himself!), because while there are a LOT of good odds cost cards, they are often more utility based than deck defining and its harder to really stuff em in there. The lack of 3 cost events and the fact that most of the 1 cost events are more situational really hurts aligning towards that, and honestly it isn't too anti-synergistic with onyx because drawing cards still helps your future searches for onyx, especially if those drawn cards further accelerate you through your deck. Of course, this could all shift on a dime depending on your off class, and I am sure someome smarter than me will make a really great 'odds' deck down the line.

Finally, there is the third, secret, 'get thrown out of the O'Banon Casino for counting cards' deck strategy of just remembering what is in your deck, figuring out what you need and what you are likely to get, and deciding on the fly, which makes this a triple threat of a card: It is fine if you just play it and kinda forget about it as long as you have a good grasp on your deck's current state, it could be a fun deckbuilding challenge that forces you to try to 'figure out odd mystic' or figure out how many fast effects or good commit symbols you could stack in a certain cost bracket, or it could be an in game skill testing card where you need to weigh maximum card draw vs trying to 'target' cards you need!

As such, while he may not be razzle dazzle, Kirby is a worthy inclusion into the Arkham Card Game, simply because he is likely going to be REALLY fun to toy around with for a LOT of nerds like me who really like to bust out the abacus. He has a lot of depth that is hard to touch upon in this one review, like his synergy with fast actions or other ways to dump your hand out faster, or how he interacts with every other class, or how he changes the value of certain upgrades and will now make the difference between 0 and 1 cost waaaaay bigger for some characters, or how you might use this as a pseudo tutor by trying to make sure at the very least all of your 'deal with X situation' cards are even or odd together so you can always panic draw for them, or how a lot of staple seeker combat tools are odd cards and thus this encourages seekers to be more helpless.

A++ design, if nothing else, for just the sheer puzzle that was placed into every seeker's lap. And good seekers LOVE puzzles.

dezzmont · 204

Downside: This guy assumes you don't run skill, or very few of them, which means you run pump skill cards instead (hyper awareness or higher education).

Upside: Insane payoff. Draw 5 (to a minimum of 3 if you draw both weaknesses), with 2/1 soak with +1 int is definitely worth the build around, especially if your off-class matches.

Note : you should run him with an even cost deck because 1. he can draw himself, and 2. most resources cards are even, which synergies further with the pump skill card logic.

mugu · 149
0 is even. Skill cards have a cost of 0... I think. — Onetribe · 317
Skills don't have any cost, which is different than having a cost of 0. "A card’s resource cost is the numerical value that must be paid (in resources) to play the card from hand." — vlad3theimpaler · 1

With the recent tabboo list this guy will now cost 2xp. Personally, this is a mistake for my group and we will NOT abide by this rule. We use complete tabboo list, but this change we will simply ignore. Reason why he is coming on the list is because we are getting a rogue card that lets you put an ally into play and return it back at the end of your turn. Same like Sleight of Hand but for allies. And again just like with that card, they are not changing the card that makes the problem, but the payoff card. Just like nerfing Three Aces or Pendant of the Queen or something similar when it was clear that Mr. "Rook" and Mandy Thompson were the problem, or million cards that were abused with sleight of hand, my group simply will not play another year or so with this sour taste in our mouth knowing that they again made the same mistake but since it is just getting released they will wait a year or so before nerfing that rogue card. Kirby is not so strong, yes maybe draw 4-5 cards is a lot but my group does not play game breaking decks and after what, 6 years?!?! they gave us an ally that managed to squeeze out famous Dr. Milan Christopher from every damn seeker deck. If we stick to the tabboo list, again it will be just milan over again, so we decided to just say screw it. It is your call to make folks, but i just wanted to share how the thoughts of my group went. Cheers!

Blood&gore · 388
Personally, I don't get, what makes this dude so popular with so many groups. Not only does he force you to take clunky choices based on whether the card cost are even or odd, he also deprives you from taking some of the most powerful cards in seekers: skills. (That's IF you want to draw five cards with him consistently.) Dr. Christopher is sure still very popular in our group, but he is far from omnipresent. Whitton Green, Research Librarian, Gené Beauregard, Lab Assistent, Mr. Rook (pre-taboo) were all very popular at times and can still compete with Dr. Christopher in specific decks. — Susumu · 351
Exactly, he is not even that strong and requires investing some time into making deck, and still then is probably just worse version of dr milan. That is exactly why i say that we will not make him cost 2xp, it is nonsense — Blood&gore · 388
Sleight of Hand has been the most problematic card in terms of balance (evident by it's many taboo iterations in attempt to get it right). So they just thought "let's do the exact same thing with allies!". What on earth were they thinking? — snacc · 975
Yeah what the hell have they done :p — captainfire · 223
We tabooed him to be : 0xp + "You can only put Kirby into play with a Play action" which exclude the new Rogue card and let him be good but certainly not broken ;) Hope it helps :) — captainfire · 223
Good news. In the new taboo list they changed it to 0xp and added "Max twice per game" — hfp32 · 1

Many of the excellent reviews compare J.K. to Dr. Milan Christopher, but it's also helpful to consider J.K. in comparison to a different card - the humble Laboratory Assistant.


  • draw cards when played
  • Seeker
  • icon for skill tests
  • Ally
  • Miskatonic (so most investigators can have loads of ally slots, thanks to Miskatonic Archaeology Funding)
  • even cost

Laboratory Assistant advantages

  • costs less
  • 2 sanity
  • increases hand size by 2
  • 0 xp (versus 2 with the new taboo for J.K.)
  • Science

Jeremiah Kirby advantages

  • 2 health
  • +1
  • draws more cards, probably
    • never, ever draws weaknesses
  • Wayfarer

They're curiously similar cards in that they front load most of their benefit to the time they're played. That makes them particularly attractive with cards that trampoline them:

Has anyone tried all these in a deck together? I'm considering it.

MrWeasely · 41
Kirby can draw weaknesses, Dark Pact, the Devil, the Tower, Clasp of Black Onyx, some gator specific ones though admittedly only gators that would have to versatile for kirby — NarkasisBroon · 10
Pay your due, Underprepared, Quantum Paradox — NarkasisBroon · 10
This card is game-breaking when played from Hit and Run. — Horo · 36
Wouldn't the "reveal the top 5 cards of your deck" part of his wording cause any treachery weakness to be triggered ? — aurchen · 1
@aurchen Revelation abilities trigger specifically when the card is drawn (rulebook p.18). It does not trigger when the card is "revealed" even though the wording would suggest so. It's not particularly intuitive. — snacc · 975